Title: | Creates Plots Accompanying Bayesian Diagnostic Test Accuracy Meta-Analyses |
---|---|
Description: | Function to create forest plots. Functions to use posterior samples from Bayesian bivariate meta-analysis model, Bayesian hierarchical summary receiver operating characteristic (HSROC) meta-analysis model or Bayesian latent class (LC) meta-analysis model to create Summary Receiver Operating Characteristic (SROC) plots using methods described by Harbord et al (2007)<doi:10.1093/biostatistics/kxl004>. |
Authors: | Ian Schiller [aut, cre], Nandini Dendukuri [ctb] |
Maintainer: | Ian Schiller <[email protected]> |
License: | GPL (>= 2) |
Version: | 1.0.2.5 |
Built: | 2025-03-01 06:06:47 UTC |
Source: | https://github.com/cran/DTAplots |
This dataset gives the observed cross-tabulation of the Anti-cyclic citrullinated peptide (Anti-CCP) test for rheumatoid arthritis (test under evaluation) and the 1987 revised American college or Rheumatology (ACR) criteria or clinical diagnosis (reference test) for 37 studies.
data(Anti_CCP)
data(Anti_CCP)
A data frame with 37 observations on the following 5 variables.
Study
First author and year of publication of the study.
TP
Individuals who tested positive on both tests.
FP
Individuals who tested positive on the test under evaluation and negative on the reference test.
FN
Individuals who tested negative on the test under evaluation and positive on the reference test.
TN
Individuals who tested negative on both tests.
Nishimura K, Sugiyama D, Kogata Y, Tsuji G, Nakazawa T, Kawano S, Saigo K, Morinobu A, Koshiba M, Kuntz KM, Kamae I, Kumagai S. Meta-analysis: diagnostic accuracy of anti-cyclic citrullinated peptide antibody and rheumatoid factor for rheumatoid arthritis. Ann Intern Med. 2007 Jun 5;146(11):797-808. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-146-11-200706050-00008. PMID: 17548411.
Function to create adjacent forest plots for both sensitivity and specificity also displaying study labels and 2x2 tables
Forest(Data, study = NULL, level = 0.95, conf.int = "Wilson", se.axis = NULL, sp.axis = NULL, save_plot = NULL, res = 90, summary = NULL, digits = 2, summary_label = NULL, study.cex=1, summary.cex=1.1, col.headers = c("Study", "TP", "FP", "FN", "TN", "Sens (95% CI)", "Spec (95% CI)", "Sens (95% CI)", "Spec (95% CI)"))
Forest(Data, study = NULL, level = 0.95, conf.int = "Wilson", se.axis = NULL, sp.axis = NULL, save_plot = NULL, res = 90, summary = NULL, digits = 2, summary_label = NULL, study.cex=1, summary.cex=1.1, col.headers = c("Study", "TP", "FP", "FN", "TN", "Sens (95% CI)", "Spec (95% CI)", "Sens (95% CI)", "Spec (95% CI)"))
Data |
a data frame with the number of rows equal to the number of studies and 4 columns. Each row consists of the entries of the 2x2 table of the index test (i.e. test under evaluation) vs. the reference test reported in each study. The ordering of the columns is ++, +-, -+, –, where the first entry refers to the result of the test under evaluation and the second entry refers to the result of the reference test. The header of the data frame must be "TP", "FP", "FN" and "TN", respectively. |
study |
a character vector of study/labels, e.g. Author (and Year) for each study. If NULL, the function will generate generic labels : "Study 1, Study 2, ..." |
level |
confidence level of the confidence intervals for sensitivity and specificity estimates. |
conf.int |
method used to compute the confidence interval for a biomial proportion. Either "Normal.approx" or "Wilson" (default). |
se.axis |
x-axis range for sensitivity, based on a vector of 2 components. The first component should be the minimum of the desired x-axis range, while the second component should be the maximum of the desired x-axis range. If NULL (default), the range is calculated from the Data (min,max) of sensitivity. |
sp.axis |
x-axis range for specificity, based on a vector of 2 components. The first component should be the minimum of the desired x-axis range, while the second component should be the maximum of the desired x-axis range. If NULL (default), the range is calculated from the Data (min,max) of specificity. |
save_plot |
character string pointing to the directory where the plot will be saved in .jpeg format. If NULL, no plot will be saved. |
res |
esolution (dpi) of the jpeg file. |
summary |
Default is NULL. This will add summary point estimates that were calculated externaly. Multiple summary points can be provided. If provided, summary should be in the form of a matrix with with each row representing one summary point made of 6 columns. The columns should be (order matters) :
1- summary point estimate for individuals truly positive (i.e. sensitivity). |
digits |
number of decimal places to display for sensitivity/specificity point estimates and respective interval limits. Default = 2. |
summary_label |
To provide names to the summary point estimates provided by summary argument. Default is NULL |
study.cex |
Change font size of study labels provided by argument study |
summary.cex |
Change font size of summary labels provided by argument summary_label |
col.headers |
To change the headers of the forest plot sections. |
No return value
Ian Schiller and Nandini Dendukuri
# FUNCTION USED WITH DEFAULT ARGUMENTS data(Anti_CCP) Forest(Anti_CCP) # CONFIDENCE INTERVAL BASED ON THE NORMAL APPROXIMATION METHOD Forest(Anti_CCP, conf.int = "Normal.approx") # SET THE SENSITIVITY & SPECIFICITY X-AXES FROM 0 TO 1 INSTEAD Forest(Anti_CCP, se.axis = c(0,1), sp.axis = c(0,1) ) # PROVIDE STUDY LABELS Forest(Anti_CCP, study=Anti_CCP$Study) # To display the sensitivity and specificity summary point estimates previously obtained # from a Bayesian bivariate meta-analysis model. data(posterior_samples_Bivariate) Summary_Se = median(posterior_samples_Bivariate[,1]) Summary_Se_low = quantile(posterior_samples_Bivariate[,1], prob=0.025) Summary_Se_up = quantile(posterior_samples_Bivariate[,1], prob=0.975) Summary_Sp = median(posterior_samples_Bivariate[,2]) Summary_Sp_low = quantile(posterior_samples_Bivariate[,2], prob=0.025) Summary_Sp_up = quantile(posterior_samples_Bivariate[,2], prob=0.975) Forest(Anti_CCP, study=Anti_CCP$Study, summary = cbind(Summary_Se, Summary_Se_low, Summary_Se_up, Summary_Sp, Summary_Sp_low, Summary_Sp_up)) # Random summary point estimates generated for illustrative example n = 5 # Simulate summary point estimates coming from 5 different models Summary_Se = runif(n, 0.5,0.6) Summary_Se_low = runif(n, 0.4, 0.5) Summary_Se_up = runif(n, 0.6,0.7) Summary_Sp =runif(n, 0.9,0.95) Summary_Sp_low = runif(n, 0.85,0.9) Summary_Sp_up = runif(n, 0.95,1) Forest(Anti_CCP, study=Anti_CCP$Study, summary = cbind(Summary_Se, Summary_Se_low, Summary_Se_up, Summary_Sp, Summary_Sp_low, Summary_Sp_up), summary_label=c("Summary estimate 1", "Summary estimate 2", "Summary estimate 3", "Summary estimate 4", "Summary estimate 5"))
# FUNCTION USED WITH DEFAULT ARGUMENTS data(Anti_CCP) Forest(Anti_CCP) # CONFIDENCE INTERVAL BASED ON THE NORMAL APPROXIMATION METHOD Forest(Anti_CCP, conf.int = "Normal.approx") # SET THE SENSITIVITY & SPECIFICITY X-AXES FROM 0 TO 1 INSTEAD Forest(Anti_CCP, se.axis = c(0,1), sp.axis = c(0,1) ) # PROVIDE STUDY LABELS Forest(Anti_CCP, study=Anti_CCP$Study) # To display the sensitivity and specificity summary point estimates previously obtained # from a Bayesian bivariate meta-analysis model. data(posterior_samples_Bivariate) Summary_Se = median(posterior_samples_Bivariate[,1]) Summary_Se_low = quantile(posterior_samples_Bivariate[,1], prob=0.025) Summary_Se_up = quantile(posterior_samples_Bivariate[,1], prob=0.975) Summary_Sp = median(posterior_samples_Bivariate[,2]) Summary_Sp_low = quantile(posterior_samples_Bivariate[,2], prob=0.025) Summary_Sp_up = quantile(posterior_samples_Bivariate[,2], prob=0.975) Forest(Anti_CCP, study=Anti_CCP$Study, summary = cbind(Summary_Se, Summary_Se_low, Summary_Se_up, Summary_Sp, Summary_Sp_low, Summary_Sp_up)) # Random summary point estimates generated for illustrative example n = 5 # Simulate summary point estimates coming from 5 different models Summary_Se = runif(n, 0.5,0.6) Summary_Se_low = runif(n, 0.4, 0.5) Summary_Se_up = runif(n, 0.6,0.7) Summary_Sp =runif(n, 0.9,0.95) Summary_Sp_low = runif(n, 0.85,0.9) Summary_Sp_up = runif(n, 0.95,1) Forest(Anti_CCP, study=Anti_CCP$Study, summary = cbind(Summary_Se, Summary_Se_low, Summary_Se_up, Summary_Sp, Summary_Sp_low, Summary_Sp_up), summary_label=c("Summary estimate 1", "Summary estimate 2", "Summary estimate 3", "Summary estimate 4", "Summary estimate 5"))
This dataset provides a sample from the posterior distributions of the various parameters resulting from a Bayesian bivariate meta-analysis model, that are needed to create a summary plot in the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) space.
The posterior samples were obtained by fitting the Bivariate model using the rjags package to data from a systematic review of anti-cyclic citrullinated peptide antibody (anti-CCP) for rheumatoid arthritis. Overall, 37 studies were meta-analyzed, a total of 3 chains were used with 14,000 burn-in iterations after which we drew 1,000 samples from the posterior distributions for the following parameters:
“mu[1]” for the mean logit-transformed sensitivity.
“mu[2]” for the mean logit-transformed specificity.
“tau[1]” for the between-study standard deviation in the logit-transformed sensitivity.
“tau[2]” for the between-study standard deviation in the logit-transformed specificity.
“rho” for the correlation between the mean logit-transformed sensitivity and the mean logit-transformed specificity.
“se” for the logit-transformed sensitivity in individual studies.
“sp” for the logit-transformed specificity in individual studies.
“Mean_Se” for the mean sensitivity.
“Mean_Sp” for the mean specificity.
data(posterior_samples_Bivariate)
data(posterior_samples_Bivariate)
A matrix with 3,000 samples from the posterior distribution for each of the 81 parameters listed in the description above.
Nishimura K, Sugiyama D, Kogata Y, Tsuji G, Nakazawa T, Kawano S, Saigo K, Morinobu A, Koshiba M, Kuntz KM, Kamae I, Kumagai S. Meta-analysis: diagnostic accuracy of anti-cyclic citrullinated peptide antibody and rheumatoid factor for rheumatoid arthritis. Ann Intern Med. 2007 Jun 5;146(11):797-808. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-146-11-200706050-00008. PMID: 17548411.
This dataset provides a sample from the posterior distributions of the various parameters resulting from a Bayesian hierarchical summary receiver operating characteristic (HSROC) meta-analysis model, that are needed to create a SROC plot in the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) space.
The posterior samples were obtained by fitting the HSROC model using the rjags package to data from a systematic review of anti-cyclic citrullinated peptide antibody (anti-CCP) for rheumatoid arthritis. Overall, 37 studies were meta-analyzed, a total of 3 chains were used with 14,000 burn-in iterations after which we drew 1,000 samples from the posterior distributions for the following parameters:
“THETA” for the overall mean cut-off value for defining a positive test (threshold parameter).
“LAMBDA” for the overall difference in means (accuracy parameter).
“beta” for the logarithm of the ratio of the standard deviation of test results among patients with and without the disease.
“tau[1]” for the standard deviation of the accuracy parameter.
“tau[2]” for the standard deviation of the threshold parameter.
“se” for the individual logit-transformed sensitivity.
“sp” for the individual logit-transformed specificity.
data(posterior_samples_HSROC)
data(posterior_samples_HSROC)
A matrix with 3,000 samples from the posterior distribution for each of the 79 parameters listed in the description above.
Nishimura K, Sugiyama D, Kogata Y, Tsuji G, Nakazawa T, Kawano S, Saigo K, Morinobu A, Koshiba M, Kuntz KM, Kamae I, Kumagai S. Meta-analysis: diagnostic accuracy of anti-cyclic citrullinated peptide antibody and rheumatoid factor for rheumatoid arthritis. Ann Intern Med. 2007 Jun 5;146(11):797-808. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-146-11-200706050-00008. PMID: 17548411.
This dataset provides a sample from the posterior distributions of various parameters resulting from an extended Bayesian bivariate meta-analysis model which accounts for the reference test to be imperfect. These parameters can then be used to create a summary plot in the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) space.
The posterior samples were obtained by fitting the latent class model using the rjags pacakge to data from a Cochrane Review to assess the accuracy of the GeneXpertTM (Xpert) test for tuberculosis (TB) meningitis in extrapulmonary specimens. In each study the index test was Xpert and the reference standard was culture. Both tests are known to have sub-optimal sensitivity, therefore the true TB meningitis status is unknown. Overall, 29 studies were meta-analyzed, a total of 3 chains were used with 14,000 burn-in iterations after which we drew 1,000 samples from the posterior distributions for the following parameters :
“mu[1]” for the mean logit-transformed sensitivity.
“mu[2]” for the mean logit-transformed specificity.
“tau[1]” for the between-study standard deviation in the logit-transformed sensitivity.
“tau[2]” for the between-study standard deviation in the logit-transformed specificity.
“rho” for the correlation between the mean logit-transformed sensitivity and the mean logit-transformed specificity.
“se” for the logit-transformed sensitivity in individual studies.
“sp” for the logit-transformed specificity in individual studies.
“Mean_Se” for the mean sensitivity.
“Mean_Sp” for the mean specificity.
data(posterior_samples_Bivariate)
data(posterior_samples_Bivariate)
A matrix with 3,000 samples from the posterior distribution for each of the 67 parameters listed in the description above.
Kohli M, Schiller I, Dendukuri N, et al. Xpert® MTB/RIF assay for extrapulmonary tuberculosis and rifampicin resistance. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018;8(8):CD012768.
This function creates : 1) a plot of the mean sensitivity and mean specificity together with prediction and credible region resulting from a bivariate meta-analysis model, or 2) a summary ROC curve resulting from a hierarchical summary receiver operating characteristic (HSROC) meta-analysis model. It uses posterior samples of ? from these meta-analysis models obtained with rjags package from a meta-analysis bivariate model for diagnostic test accuracy. It allows for the possibility that the reference test is not perfect.
SROC_rjags(X, n, model = "Bivariate", dataset = NULL, ref_std=NULL, title = "Summary plot", xlab = "Specificity", ylab = "Sensitivity", Se.range=c(0,1), Sp.range=c(0,1), SROC_curve = FALSE, lwd.curve=3, col.curve="black", lty.curve="solid", cred_region = TRUE, predict_region = TRUE, region_level = 0.95, lty.cred.region = "solid", lty.predict.region = "dotted", trunc_low = 0.025, trunc_up = 0.025, col.predict.region = "black", col.cred.region = "red", lwd.cred.region = 2.5, lwd.predict.region = 2.5, study_col1 = "blue", study_col2 = rgb(0, 0, 1, 0.15), study_symbol = "circles", summary.point=TRUE, pch.summary.point = 19, cex.summary.point = 3, col.summary.point = 1)
SROC_rjags(X, n, model = "Bivariate", dataset = NULL, ref_std=NULL, title = "Summary plot", xlab = "Specificity", ylab = "Sensitivity", Se.range=c(0,1), Sp.range=c(0,1), SROC_curve = FALSE, lwd.curve=3, col.curve="black", lty.curve="solid", cred_region = TRUE, predict_region = TRUE, region_level = 0.95, lty.cred.region = "solid", lty.predict.region = "dotted", trunc_low = 0.025, trunc_up = 0.025, col.predict.region = "black", col.cred.region = "red", lwd.cred.region = 2.5, lwd.predict.region = 2.5, study_col1 = "blue", study_col2 = rgb(0, 0, 1, 0.15), study_symbol = "circles", summary.point=TRUE, pch.summary.point = 19, cex.summary.point = 3, col.summary.point = 1)
X |
An mcmc.list object. See details for further explanations. |
n |
Number of studies in the meta-analysis. |
model |
specify the model used to create |
dataset |
a matrix with the number of rows equal to the number of studies and 4 columns. Each row consists of the entries of the 2x2 table of the index test (i.e. test under evaluation) vs. the reference test reported in each study. The ordering of the columns is ++, +-, -+, –, where the first entry refers to the result of the test under evaluation and the second entry refers to the result of the reference test. If set to NULL (default), individual posterior estimates of test under evaluation characteristics, i.e. points with coordinate (sensitivity, (1-specificity)), will not be drawn on the SROC plot. |
ref_std |
if "dataset" is not set to NULL, then "ref_std" must be set to TRUE if the meta-analysis model assumes a perfect reference standard test or to FALSE if the meta-analysis model assumes an imperfect reference standard test. |
title |
plot title. |
xlab |
x axis label. |
ylab |
y axis label. |
Se.range |
the y-axis limits of the plot. |
Sp.range |
the x-axis limits of the plot. |
SROC_curve |
logical. If TRUE, a SROC curve is drawn. |
lwd.curve |
The line width of the SROC curve, a positive number, defaulting to 3. See "lwd" in "par". |
col.curve |
A specification for the default color of the SROC curve. Defaults to "black". See "col" in "par". |
lty.curve |
The SROC curve line type. Default to "solid". See "lty" in "par". |
cred_region |
logical. If TRUE (default), a credible region curve is drawn on the plot. |
predict_region |
logical. If TRUE (default), a prediction region curve is drawn on the plot. |
region_level |
The credible (prediction) level required for the credible (prediction) region. Default value ie 0.95. |
lty.cred.region |
The credible region line type. Default to "solid". See "lty" in "par". |
lty.predict.region |
The prediction region line type. Default to "dotted". See "lty" in "par". |
trunc_low |
Quantile to determine lower limit of threshold THETA used for creating the SROC curve. Default to 0.025. See details for further explanations. |
trunc_up |
Quantile to determine upper limit of the threshold THETA used for creating the SROC curve. Default to 0.025. See details for further explanations. |
col.predict.region |
specification for the default plotting color of the prediction region curve. Defaults to "black". |
col.cred.region |
specification for the default plotting color of the credible region curve. Defaults to "red". |
lwd.cred.region |
The line width of the credible region curve, a positive number, defaulting to 2.5. |
lwd.predict.region |
line width of the prediction region, a positive number, defaulting to 2.5. |
study_col1 |
specification for the default plotting color of the individual study point perimeter. Defaults to "blue". |
study_col2 |
specification for the default plotting color of the individual study point shading. Defaults to rgb(0, 0, 1, 0.15). |
study_symbol |
specification of the type of symbol to represent the individual study point. Either "circles" (default) or "squares". |
summary.point |
logical. If TRUE (default), a summary point estimate of coordinate (mean specificity, mean sensitivity) is drawn. |
pch.summary.point |
An integer specifying a symbol to represent the joint mean sensitivity and mean specificity summary point estimate. See "pch" in "par". |
cex.summary.point |
The magnification to be used for the symbol to represent the joint mean sensitivity and mean specificity summary point estimate. |
col.summary.point |
A specification for the default color. |
If model is set to Bivariate
, the function expects that the parameters of the bivariate model have been spelled exactly as follows in the jags model :
“mu[1]” for the mean logit-transformed sensitivity.
“mu[2]” for the mean logit-transformed specificity.
“tau[1]” for the between-study standard deviation in the logit-transformed sensitivity.
“tau[2]” for the between-study standard deviation in the logit-transformed specificity.
“rho” for the correlation between the logit-transformed sensitivity and the mean logit-transformed specificity.
“se” for the logit-transformed sensitivity in individual studies.
“sp” for the logit-transformed specificity in individual studies.
“Summary_Se” for the sensitivity summary estimate.
“Summary_Sp” for the specificity summary estimate.
If model is set to HSROC
, the function expects that the parameters of the HSROC model have been spelled exactly as follows in the jags model :
“THETA” for the overall mean cut-off value for defining a positive test (threshold parameter).
“LAMBDA” for the overall difference in means (accuracy parameter).
“beta” for the logarithm of the ratio of the standard deviation of test results among patients with and without the disease.
“tau[1]” for the standard deviation of the accuracy parameter.
“tau[2]” for the standard deviation of the threshold parameter.
“se” for the logit-transformed sensitivity in individual studies.
“sp” for the logit-transformed specificity in individual studies.
The default values for arguments of the function assume the posterior densities provided are for parameters of a Bivariate model. Therefore, it will create a plot with a summary point, credible and prediction region curves.
If the argument SROC_curve
is set to true, the function will plot Sensitivity vs Specificity at the posterior mean values of LAMBDA and beta across values of the posterior sample of THETA. The trunc_low
and trunc_up
arguments truncate the posterior sample of THETA by (trunc_low
)*100 to (trunc_up
)*100 to ensure the SROC curve remains within the observed scope of the study points.
No return value
Ian Schiller and Nandini Dendukuri
Rutter, C. M., and Gatsonis, C. A. (2001) A hierarchical regression approach to meta-analysis of diagnostic accuracy evaluations. Statistics in Medicine, 20(19):2865-2884.
Reitsma, J.B., Glas, A.S., Rutjes, A.W.S., Scholten, R.J.P.M., Bossuyt, P.M. and Zwinderman, A.H. (2005). Bivariate analysis of sensitivity and specificity produces informative summary measures in diagnostic reviews. Journal of Clinical Epideiology 58, 982-90
Harbord, R.M., Deeks, J.J, Egger, M., Whiting, P., and Sterne, J.A. (2007) A unification of models for meta-analysis of diagnostic accuracy studies. Biostatistics 8, 239-251.
Dendukuri, N., Schiller, I., Joseph, L., and Pai, M. (2012) Bayesian meta-analysis of the accuracy of a test for tuberculosis pleuritis in the absence of a gold-standard reference. Biometrics. doi:10.1111/j. 1541-0420.2012.01773.x
############################################################################################## # The example requires the rjags output from a bivariate meta-analysis model. # We use the posterior_samples_Bivariate dataset which contains the results of a # bivariate meta-analysis of Anti_CCP dataset. #The number of studies data(Anti_CCP) n=dim(Anti_CCP)[1] #We load the samples of the posterior distribution data(posterior_samples_Bivariate) # Summary plot SROC_rjags(X=posterior_samples_Bivariate, model="Bivariate",n=n, study_col1="blue", study_col2=rgb(0, 0, 1, 0.15), dataset=Anti_CCP[,2:5], ref_std=TRUE) ########################################################################################## # The example requires the rjags output from a HSROC meta-analysis model. # We use the posterior_samples_HSROC dataset which contains the results of a # HSROC meta-analysis of the Anti_CCP dataset. #The number of studies data(Anti_CCP) n=dim(Anti_CCP)[1] #We load the samples of the posterior distribution data(posterior_samples_HSROC) # Summary plot SROC_rjags(X=posterior_samples_HSROC, model="HSROC",n=n, study_col1="blue", study_col2=rgb(0, 0, 1, 0.15), dataset=Anti_CCP[,2:5], ref_std=TRUE, SROC_curve = TRUE, cred_region = FALSE, predict_region = FALSE) ########################################################################################## # The example requires the rjags output from a Bayesian latent class meta-analysis model. # We use the posterior_samples_LC dataset which contains the results of a # latent class meta-analysis of the Xpert dataset. #The number of studies data(Xpert) n=dim(Xpert)[1] #We load the samples of the posterior distribution data(posterior_samples_LC) # Summary plot SROC_rjags(X=posterior_samples_LC, model="Bivariate",n=n, study_col1="blue", study_col2=rgb(0, 0, 1, 0.15), dataset=Xpert[,2:5], ref_std=FALSE)
############################################################################################## # The example requires the rjags output from a bivariate meta-analysis model. # We use the posterior_samples_Bivariate dataset which contains the results of a # bivariate meta-analysis of Anti_CCP dataset. #The number of studies data(Anti_CCP) n=dim(Anti_CCP)[1] #We load the samples of the posterior distribution data(posterior_samples_Bivariate) # Summary plot SROC_rjags(X=posterior_samples_Bivariate, model="Bivariate",n=n, study_col1="blue", study_col2=rgb(0, 0, 1, 0.15), dataset=Anti_CCP[,2:5], ref_std=TRUE) ########################################################################################## # The example requires the rjags output from a HSROC meta-analysis model. # We use the posterior_samples_HSROC dataset which contains the results of a # HSROC meta-analysis of the Anti_CCP dataset. #The number of studies data(Anti_CCP) n=dim(Anti_CCP)[1] #We load the samples of the posterior distribution data(posterior_samples_HSROC) # Summary plot SROC_rjags(X=posterior_samples_HSROC, model="HSROC",n=n, study_col1="blue", study_col2=rgb(0, 0, 1, 0.15), dataset=Anti_CCP[,2:5], ref_std=TRUE, SROC_curve = TRUE, cred_region = FALSE, predict_region = FALSE) ########################################################################################## # The example requires the rjags output from a Bayesian latent class meta-analysis model. # We use the posterior_samples_LC dataset which contains the results of a # latent class meta-analysis of the Xpert dataset. #The number of studies data(Xpert) n=dim(Xpert)[1] #We load the samples of the posterior distribution data(posterior_samples_LC) # Summary plot SROC_rjags(X=posterior_samples_LC, model="Bivariate",n=n, study_col1="blue", study_col2=rgb(0, 0, 1, 0.15), dataset=Xpert[,2:5], ref_std=FALSE)
This dataset gives the observed cross-tabulation of GeneXpertTM (Xpert) test for tuberculosis (TB) meningitis in extrapulmonary specimens (test under evaluation) and culture (reference test) for 29 studies.
data(Xpert)
data(Xpert)
A data frame with 29 observations on the following 5 variables.
Study
First author and year of publication of the study.
++
Individuals who tested positive on both tests.
+-
Individuals who tested positive on the test under evaluation and negative on the reference test.
-+
Individuals who tested negative on the test under evaluation and positive on the reference test.
--
Individuals who tested negative on both tests.
Kohli M, Schiller I, Dendukuri N, et al. Xpert® MTB/RIF assay for extrapulmonary tuberculosis and rifampicin resistance. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018;8(8):CD012768.